001-methodology-choice.md
markdown
sha256:8915fe406161f95c1681f9469375e7bae5b28c884f00bedbdef65e4b0cd0738d
docs(flow): commit FLOW-V0-SPEC.md hygiene for 7A-INT merge
Human
17 hours ago
title: "ADR 001: Primary readout for cytokine pilot — ELISA vs bead multiplex" project: research-lab-template tags:
- adr
- decision
- assay date: 2026-04-07
ADR 001: Primary readout for cytokine pilot — ELISA vs bead multiplex
Status
Accepted (template example)
Context
The cytokine secretion pilot needs a quantitative primary endpoint for six analytes across 48 conditions. Turnaround, cost, and dynamic range differ between plate ELISA and bead-based multiplex assays.
Decision drivers
- Sample volume limited to 50 µL per technical replicate.
- Need semi-high throughput within two weeks of cell treatment.
- Lab has existing plate reader but no dedicated Luminex on site.
Options considered
- ELISA panels (six separate kits) — gold-standard familiarity; high sample consumption; slower batching.
- Bead multiplex (outsourced or core facility) — lower volume per analyte; dependency on core queue; higher per-sample fee.
- Mesoscale discovery (MSD) — excellent sensitivity; overkill for pilot budget in this template scenario.
Decision
Proceed with bead multiplex via university core for the pilot primary endpoint; retain ELISA for confirmatory spot checks on two highest-variance analytes.
Consequences
Fits volume and throughput; downside is core shipping/batching delays—lock the sample manifest early. Revisit after the pilot if CV% or LOD miss the experiment plan.
File History
1 commit
sha256:8915fe406161f95c1681f9469375e7bae5b28c884f00bedbdef65e4b0cd0738d
docs(flow): commit FLOW-V0-SPEC.md hygiene for 7A-INT merge
Human
17 hours ago