001-methodology-choice.md
markdown
sha256:7fe782411f3a68b39f17777b274349b30752365c13438b26bfd602c687de2c65
feat(web): rebrand Parentier family to Ourware on landing
Human
minor
⚠ breaking
23 days ago
title: "ADR 001: Primary readout for cytokine pilot — ELISA vs bead multiplex" project: research-lab-template tags:
- adr
- decision
- assay date: 2026-04-07
ADR 001: Primary readout for cytokine pilot — ELISA vs bead multiplex
Status
Accepted (template example)
Context
The cytokine secretion pilot needs a quantitative primary endpoint for six analytes across 48 conditions. Turnaround, cost, and dynamic range differ between plate ELISA and bead-based multiplex assays.
Decision drivers
- Sample volume limited to 50 µL per technical replicate.
- Need semi-high throughput within two weeks of cell treatment.
- Lab has existing plate reader but no dedicated Luminex on site.
Options considered
- ELISA panels (six separate kits) — gold-standard familiarity; high sample consumption; slower batching.
- Bead multiplex (outsourced or core facility) — lower volume per analyte; dependency on core queue; higher per-sample fee.
- Mesoscale discovery (MSD) — excellent sensitivity; overkill for pilot budget in this template scenario.
Decision
Proceed with bead multiplex via university core for the pilot primary endpoint; retain ELISA for confirmatory spot checks on two highest-variance analytes.
Consequences
Fits volume and throughput; downside is core shipping/batching delays—lock the sample manifest early. Revisit after the pilot if CV% or LOD miss the experiment plan.
File History
1 commit
sha256:7fe782411f3a68b39f17777b274349b30752365c13438b26bfd602c687de2c65
feat(web): rebrand Parentier family to Ourware on landing
Human
minor
⚠
23 days ago