example-paper-review.md
markdown
sha256:c2dbf04d56308f3bbf2d06e6d2eb022b8948b1e827195fe525a44e5e18d5f9c0
feat(auth): Phase B Connect cloud agent (RFC 8628) + Hermes…
Human
minor
⚠ breaking
12 days ago
title: "Literature review: Chen et al. 2025 — multiplex CRISPR screening in primary T cells" project: research-lab-template tags:
- literature
- crispr
- immunology date: 2026-04-07
Chen et al. 2025 — multiplex CRISPR screening in primary T cells
Citation (hypothetical for template): Chen, L. et al. Nat. Methods (2025). DOI: 10.xxxx/nmeth.2025.xxx
One-line summary
The authors combine pooled CRISPR perturbations with single-cell RNA-seq in ex vivo human T cells, reporting improved guide detection sensitivity versus prior plate-based assays.
Key findings
- Multiplexing ~120 guides per donor while retaining >70% cell viability at 72h under their electroporation conditions.
- A computational demultiplexing step reduces doublet-induced false positives; code is available (check license before reuse).
- Validation with orthogonal flow cytometry on top hits matches directionality in four of five targets tested.
Methods worth noting
- Electroporation parameters and media supplements are specified in supplementary tables—useful if we replicate stress controls.
- They normalize by non-targeting guides using a trimmed mean; may bias rare phenotypes.
Relevance to our lab
Directly applicable if we pivot the cytokine secretion screen to primary cells. Our current immortalized line protocol will not transfer without revisiting viability curves and electroporation load.
Open questions
- Donor batch effects: only six donors in main figures.
- Long-term culture effects on editing outcomes not addressed beyond 96h.
Next step: Pilot three guides from their positive control set in our hands before scaling the library.
File History
1 commit
sha256:93bcf8f9bd56d8c5b9339f4ec73b9ebd66571398d56262d38eedc2cfa9db9882
fix(test): align Band B landing assertion with desktop MCP …
Human
12 days ago