001-methodology-choice.md
markdown
sha256:c2dbf04d56308f3bbf2d06e6d2eb022b8948b1e827195fe525a44e5e18d5f9c0
feat(auth): Phase B Connect cloud agent (RFC 8628) + Hermes…
Human
minor
⚠ breaking
11 days ago
title: "ADR 001: Primary readout for cytokine pilot — ELISA vs bead multiplex" project: research-lab-template tags:
- adr
- decision
- assay date: 2026-04-07
ADR 001: Primary readout for cytokine pilot — ELISA vs bead multiplex
Status
Accepted (template example)
Context
The cytokine secretion pilot needs a quantitative primary endpoint for six analytes across 48 conditions. Turnaround, cost, and dynamic range differ between plate ELISA and bead-based multiplex assays.
Decision drivers
- Sample volume limited to 50 µL per technical replicate.
- Need semi-high throughput within two weeks of cell treatment.
- Lab has existing plate reader but no dedicated Luminex on site.
Options considered
- ELISA panels (six separate kits) — gold-standard familiarity; high sample consumption; slower batching.
- Bead multiplex (outsourced or core facility) — lower volume per analyte; dependency on core queue; higher per-sample fee.
- Mesoscale discovery (MSD) — excellent sensitivity; overkill for pilot budget in this template scenario.
Decision
Proceed with bead multiplex via university core for the pilot primary endpoint; retain ELISA for confirmatory spot checks on two highest-variance analytes.
Consequences
Fits volume and throughput; downside is core shipping/batching delays—lock the sample manifest early. Revisit after the pilot if CV% or LOD miss the experiment plan.
File History
1 commit
sha256:93bcf8f9bd56d8c5b9339f4ec73b9ebd66571398d56262d38eedc2cfa9db9882
fix(test): align Band B landing assertion with desktop MCP …
Human
11 days ago