001-methodology-choice.md markdown
39 lines 1.4 KB
Raw
sha256:c2dbf04d56308f3bbf2d06e6d2eb022b8948b1e827195fe525a44e5e18d5f9c0 feat(auth): Phase B Connect cloud agent (RFC 8628) + Hermes… Human minor ⚠ breaking 11 days ago

title: "ADR 001: Primary readout for cytokine pilot — ELISA vs bead multiplex" project: research-lab-template tags:

  • adr
  • decision
  • assay date: 2026-04-07

ADR 001: Primary readout for cytokine pilot — ELISA vs bead multiplex

Status

Accepted (template example)

Context

The cytokine secretion pilot needs a quantitative primary endpoint for six analytes across 48 conditions. Turnaround, cost, and dynamic range differ between plate ELISA and bead-based multiplex assays.

Decision drivers

  • Sample volume limited to 50 µL per technical replicate.
  • Need semi-high throughput within two weeks of cell treatment.
  • Lab has existing plate reader but no dedicated Luminex on site.

Options considered

  1. ELISA panels (six separate kits) — gold-standard familiarity; high sample consumption; slower batching.
  2. Bead multiplex (outsourced or core facility) — lower volume per analyte; dependency on core queue; higher per-sample fee.
  3. Mesoscale discovery (MSD) — excellent sensitivity; overkill for pilot budget in this template scenario.

Decision

Proceed with bead multiplex via university core for the pilot primary endpoint; retain ELISA for confirmatory spot checks on two highest-variance analytes.

Consequences

Fits volume and throughput; downside is core shipping/batching delays—lock the sample manifest early. Revisit after the pilot if CV% or LOD miss the experiment plan.

File History 1 commit
sha256:93bcf8f9bd56d8c5b9339f4ec73b9ebd66571398d56262d38eedc2cfa9db9882 fix(test): align Band B landing assertion with desktop MCP … Human 11 days ago